In a cashless society, people use more credits. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of credit cards and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of cashless trading systems is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that the modern dealing methods can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, decreasing the cash money usage can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of social health results, as well as avoiding from rubbery, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered outstanding effects of cashless society. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both easy money’s transfer and safety payment ways apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, inappropriate cash charging method might increase the consequence of low social sanitation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of manual payments would relate to this reality that the demerits of mistaken banking operations pertain to offensive shopping. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of unsecure payment is correlated negatively with online shopping. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of money and hard cash conservation charge.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of well-prepared credit trading far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of property security prove the significance of online banking improvement, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72388059701 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16686207008 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675373134328 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8754884442 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0747317982314 0.242375264174 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0238299722946 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257898347213 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0402346172497 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213094419888 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.15 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.