In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?

Essay topics:

In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?

Recently, the phenomenon of the strengths and weaknesses of education systems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of educational systems are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that modern countries can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, beneficial education systems can provide the community with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of hard-working students, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of contemporary countries. Thus, beneficial ramifications of useful educational methods are remarkable.

From a scientific point of view, inefficient educational systems can supply society with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of time-consuming education are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described unuseful means. Hence, predicted outcomes of unknowledgeable students are noticeable.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the strengths and weaknesses of education systems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of modern countries prove the significance of a tremendous educational system, but also pinpoint possible implications.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96475770925 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39326027535 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638766519824 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4101150417 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0482483484698 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.01977271446 0.0925447433944 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224101361496 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0288834222386 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186105591595 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.