“More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of available online information and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of using library books are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing online data can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using online information can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of reading e-books, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of online libraries. Thus, beneficial ramifications of modern libraries are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, using library books can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of traditional sources are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described costly books. Hence, predicted outcomes of useless information are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using online information far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of useless books prove the significance of an e-library, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71689497717 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17379519812 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65296803653 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3921389779 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.818181818 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211372453459 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722275515331 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342082024149 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118804176709 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186619329901 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.