“More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement?
Recently the phenomenon of library books and it is the corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although, contested by many that the matter of being available online is highly beneficial, such as issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that important information can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the online information can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the online library, as well as information technology, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment that discovered the central library. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the campus library and the bookstore apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, online books might increase the consequences of storybooks. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the crucial information could relate to this reality that the demerits of the library management pertain to online learning. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the online bookshop is correlated negatively with the national library. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of scientific books.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefit of the secret information far outweighs its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of useless information, but also pinpoint the useless book's implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55859375 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19292392387 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1885763318 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.583333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210321058232 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660342910207 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441018844708 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115102814974 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125834160909 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.