In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss and give your own opinion.
Recently the phenomenon of being available of good schools and medical facilities and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that using new teachers is highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals.
From teaching and education standpoint, attending to the rural areas can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the education facilities, as well as medical centers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the poverty of rural areas. Thus beneficial ramifications of both the medical and teaching developments apparently can be seen.
Within th realm of medical and teaching developments, working freely might increase the consequences of choosing better opportunities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of using better work conditions relate to this reality that the demerits of medication problems pertain to working free. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of working in a remote rural area is correlated negatively with work problems. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of medical centers.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being free in work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sholarship prove the significance of works, but also pinpoint choosing conditions implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... discovered the poverty of rural areas. Thus beneficial ramifications of both the me...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...t increase the consequences of choosing better opportunities. Moreover, fundamental as...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rrelated negatively with work problems. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69758064516 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22320207367 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653225806452 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5984518401 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.454545455 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238298030017 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775381688107 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394844194691 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124843197521 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397978713026 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.