Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of the cars damaging and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of restricting car is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that lovely family can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the damaged environment can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the environment management, as well as the role of family, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered being a modern car. Thus, the ramification of both environmental science and the environmental problem apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, environmental issues might increase the consequences of environmental developments. Moreover, fundamental aspects rooted in the fact of environmental benefits could relate to this reality that the demerits of restricted regulations pertain to environmental studies, As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a modern car is correlated negatively with environmental pollution. Hence, it's correct to presume the preconceived notion of giving a view.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, the social environment profoundly believes that the benefits of familiar issues far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only, do the advantages of being a car proves the significance of environmental science, but also pinpoint restricted role implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65660377358 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4203961764 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.8706752519 50.4703680194 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.272727273 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187054583236 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674617768014 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036131547405 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108649520389 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239714313179 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.