Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples.
Nowadays, the matter of being more than one car in each family has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether cars are damaging the environment or not?”. It is a widely held view that limiting the number of the cars in each family to one to preserve the environment is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the confining the number of cars in each family plays a vital role in preserving the clean environment. Therefore, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is the traffic congestion that leads to air pollution, a wide variety of diseases, such as lung cancer, and contamination of ecosystem will be diminished. Secondly, the emissions of toxic gases from more cars contribute to the destruction of the ozone layer, and subsequently acid rain. In addition to this information, a group of environmentalists, working at a prestigious university conducted that the lives of the wildlife diversity are endangered. In this regard, the extinction of aquatic eco-system, global warming, and melting ice caps must be taken into consideration.
However, there is no doubt that an informed decision should be considered to address the crisis of more than one car in each family. One possible approach is producing convenient public transport system and subsequently, encouraging people to buy just one car for the whole family. The alternative solution would be holding educational sessions to raise the public awareness about the damaging the environment.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the number of cars in each family to preserve the ecosystem must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... than one car in each family has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 321.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19003115265 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11938979236 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573208722741 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9311918752 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31877618019 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968322232295 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812759744305 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18140506148 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875253535059 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.94827586207 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.