Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the number of cars should be restricted to one for one family to protect the environment. Whereas some people say that car quota per family should not be restricted, I sanguinely believe that one car per family is enough. This essay will further discuss the reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that car generates the carbon dioxide gas which harms the environment. According to my own experience, In my college days, I conducted research, which disclosed that by restricting the number of cars we can protect the environment. Thus, the beneficial ramification of restricting car apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that environment can only be protected by the alternate fuel, so restricting one car per family is not going to help. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided opinion. Research conducted by scientists shows that if people reduce the usage of the car for few days, that improves the environment. Hence, It is correct to be presumed a preconceived notion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of restricting one car per family far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of restricting the car per family prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of not doing so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, that improves the environment. Hence, It is correct to be presumed a preconcei...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12355212355 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95052448367 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544401544402 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9504721226 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.583333333 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341863356218 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129862325339 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762160363965 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219904739693 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553363401899 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.