Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples
The substantial influences of cars have sparked the controversy among the public around the globe in recent years. While specifically argument claim that car ownership should be restricted to one for each family, a group of luminaries dispute otherwise and hold an opponent's view. I am inclined highly to believe that legislation of owning more than one car per family might be a good idea. The agenda of this article is elaborations of both advantages and disadvantages of private automobiles, which clarifies how it impacts families and industries and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why limiting car's ownership should be supported. The most conspicuous one lies in the fact that the cars damage sustainable environment scheme. For instance, a group of profound environmentalists undertook a longitudinal study to shows that car's internal combustion engines are the main source of higher carbon emission in the atmosphere. Hence, it can be clearly seen that vehicles could result in deforestation, dissertation, global warming, as well as air pollution.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of family car, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that automobile industries will suffer from any restriction over private automobile ownership. Moreover, it is strongly claimed that legislation over private vehicles might lead to the higher unemployment rate. Therefore, the importance of private transport and its detriments which may affect families and industries adversely could be seen with clarity.
to recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my sentiment is that the benefits of fewer cars per family for outweigh its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vehicles could result in deforestation, dissertation, global warming, as well as...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...dversely could be seen with clarity. to recapitulate, while there are several c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53818181818 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13034521371 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5507769536 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299344102232 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103086136774 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770259083094 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167668378493 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646338127502 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.