Nowadays, the mass media including TV, radio and newspaper have become the essential part of our lives. What is your opinion?
The substantial influences of mass communication have sparked a controversy among the public in recent years. While specifically arguments claim than mass communication influence our life, a group of luminaries dispute otherwise and hold an opponent's view. I am inclined to believe that mass telecommunication influence our life on the numerous aspects. The agenda of this article is elaborate both advantages and disadvantages of mass media, which clarifies how it impacts our children life and thus leads to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why mass telecommunication is supported. The most conspicuous one lies in the fact that media broadcasting plays a pivotal rule in the advertising industries. Based on the recent survey, more than one billion dollars invested by advertisement agencies on TV networks and broadcasting technologies annually. Hence, it can be clearly seen that satellite channels and online broadcasting could result in mass communication technologies, mass communication finance, broadcasting legislation, social network communities, as well as online voting.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can clearly overwhelm the potential influences of multimedia channels, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that mass media industries are broadcasting child pornographies and an online illegal-drug trading. A group of eminent telecommunication scientists conducted a longitudinal study to uncover the potential influences of social networking on online pornography. Based on the research mass telecommunications are closely correlated with telecommunication legislation, mass media economy, mass media infrastructure, mass communication protocols, digital communication security, as well as mass media finance. Thus, the importance of digital broadcasting on media economics, media science, and communication ethnic groups could be seen with clarity.
to recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my sentiment is that the benefits of mass communication far outweigh its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...c groups could be seen with clarity. to recapitulate, while there are several c...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...munication far outweigh its drawbacks.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 5.75862068966 382% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1207.87684729 150% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08080808081 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67522568521 2.71678728327 135% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2677185169 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.923076923 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159433075349 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619603919103 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394455936536 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947718038971 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444348694709 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.28 11.5310837438 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.