Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
The substantial influence of Euthanasia has sparked the controversy among the public around the globe in recent years. While specifically argument claim that painless death is not an acceptable term in a modern society, a group of luminaries dispute otherwise and hold an opponent's view. I am inclined highly to accept that physician-assisted suicide might have positive outcomes. The agenda of this article to elaborate both advantages and disadvantages of "Mercy Killing", which clarifies how it impacts health economics, tax-payers, as well as ethnic groups, and will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why silent death, is supported. The most conspicuous one lies in the fact that permanently brain damaged disabled, who will be in a coma forever, cost a fortune on health systems. For instance, a recently undertaken study in Sydney hospitals has shown that 15% of the total hospital's beds have been occupied by patients in coma. Hence, it can be clearly seen that painless death can help health economics, health sustainability, health policy, health institutions, as well as tax-payers.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influences of Euthanasia, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that no one can predict the future of health science. Moreover, it is strongly claimed that voluntary killing is not ethical, and it is against the human rights. Therefore, the importance of nurse-assisted suicide and its detriments which may affect patient families, ethnic groups, mortality rate, religious groups NGOs, human rights activist, people in severe health conditions adversely could be seen with clarity.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my sentiment is that the benefits of Euthanasia might outweigh its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55208333333 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11914381838 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642361111111 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9262458521 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121713132019 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392156649671 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451397956945 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667569925812 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056606291633 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.