Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of not providing so much theoretical knowledege and giving more practical training throughout universities courses and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that theories are highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that training practices can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From scientist standpoint, theoretical studies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that universities, as well as universities students, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research that discovered theories importance. Thus , beneficial ramifications of both theories and uinversity lessons apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, practical trains might increase the consequences of job opportunities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of university practices relate to this reality that the demerits of practions pertain to university students. As a tangible example, a scientific research has asserted that that the downside of practical trainers is correlated negatively to the academic courses. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of practions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of theories far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of practitions prove the significance of univesrity, but also pinpoint acadmic implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'academic research'.
Suggestion: academic research
...I was a university student, I performed an academic research that discovered theories importance. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'theories'' or 'theory's'?
Suggestion: theories'; theory's
...ed an academic research that discovered theories importance. Thus , beneficial ramificat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat discovered theories importance. Thus , beneficial ramifications of both theori...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...ersity students. As a tangible example, a scientific research has asserted that that the downside of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...ple, a scientific research has asserted that that the downside of practical trainers is c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93723849372 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37543978616 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673640167364 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5485819727 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23493455912 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069694043479 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802458068133 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118460700988 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781049149579 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.