Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of providing theoretical knowlege and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that universities are highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical training can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From social standpoint, the university courses can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that scientific trainings, as well as theoretical sciences, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of university. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both university teachers and students practicings apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of academic knowledge, being a university student might increase the consequences of university educations. Moreover, fundamental aspects of written courses relate to this reality that the demerits of university pertain to theoretical sciences. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of university knowledge is correlated negatively with social knowledge. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the university.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of theory far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of university prove the significance of knowledge, but also pinpoint course implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lated negatively with social knowledge. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95041322314 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3797409259 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644628099174 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4885167603 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18145533694 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610917354373 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406115611876 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10090690667 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03528580579 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.