Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of professional workers and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the nurses and teachers are highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the greater contribution of society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, sports activities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that matters of the entertainment personalities, as well as the sports events, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered sports heroes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both low-paid workers and casual workers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of teachers and nurses, social inclusions might increase the consequences of social problems. Moreover fundamental aspects of sports clubs relate to this reality that the demerits of professional workers pertain to entertainment times. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of social workers is correlated negatively with sports injuries. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of social sciences.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being workaholic far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of hard workers prove the significance of sport events, but also pinpont entertainment implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...se the consequences of social problems. Moreover fundamental aspects of sports clubs rel...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73705179283 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26624713445 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629482071713 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2703653431 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225704212021 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071254578431 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447485554364 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122293965049 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218674286722 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.