Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, contibution of professional workers in society has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Should we pay professional workers more than sports and entertainment personalities?" Whereas it is a widely held view that professsional workers has not more contibution in society, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, professional workers are bound up inextricably with sucessful careers, which indicates they lead to both more anual salary and more contribution. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientist in 2018 demostrates the relationship between full time employment and hardworking as well as an exponential increase in social roles. Their academic criticissm was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that likelihood of professional norms is correlated positively with not only following celebrities but also music artists.
Within the realm of professional caree, without the slightest doubt, job satisfication attribute to a skilled worker, in that it would come down to choosing young employees, unskilled staff, and sesonal workers. A salient example of such attribution is doctors, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaklen to take nurses for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint social contibution problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to public attention, super stars, and even athletic heros. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of professional qualification.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that we should professional workers pay more than others workers. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...18 demostrates the relationship between full time employment and hardworking as well as a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81911262799 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34203765927 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668941979522 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.5687115559 50.4703680194 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.083333333 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171003574212 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485061490494 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566009223626 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102698474067 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548616669359 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 9.94827586207 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.