Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by the human?
Recently, space travel vs. current crucial problems has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of it?". Whereas it is a widely held view that government must be liable to face such problems, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the technology standpoint, space travel is bound up inextricably with space craft, which indicates it leads to both scientific investigation and space technology. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between satellite communication and rocket booster as well as an exponential increase in human activities. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of crucial issues is correlated positively with not only human achievement but also innovation approach.
Within the realm of telecommunication, without the slightest doubt, satellite industry attribute to astronomy field, in that it would come down to earth's gravity, space science, and academic research. A salient example of such attribution is moon travelling, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take critical problem for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint under developed countries problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to government investment, advanced technology, and even skilled astronauts. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of satellite communication company.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that government and private sector must be accountable to challenge these issues. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 148, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'earth'.
Suggestion: earth
...my field, in that it would come down to earths gravity, space science, and academic re...
^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90102389078 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21674120273 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689419795222 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.869756598 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206472361641 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061806252535 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086860925568 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112382983291 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1006311801 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.