Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development?
Recently, increasing using some languages relating to declining others has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question what are the positive and negative consequences?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, foreign languages are bound up inextricably with different nations, which indicates they lead to both globalization and communication. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between internet access and common language as well as an exponential increase in academic research. Their academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of dominant language is correlated positively with not only economic but also developed countries.
Within the realm of cultural, without the slightest doubt, native languages attribute to physical birthplace, in that it would come down to heritage values, multicultural society, and background history. A salient example of such attribution is second language learning, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take formal education for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint globalization problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to x, x, and even x. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of educational system and social networks.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that declining of using some languages must be taken into account. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...heir academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, second, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81690140845 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26366285622 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69014084507 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.564253667 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.076923077 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174798413191 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462440439743 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575275282582 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984267456951 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662817395294 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.