Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion

Recently, the importance of studying history has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of studying history?". Whereas it is a widely held view that reading the history is not highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.

From the education standpoint, historical books are bound up inextricably with past, which indicates they lead to both date and event. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between present perception and great purposes as well as an exponential increase in life experience. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of historical writer is correlated positively with not only ancient civilization but also cultural values.

Within the realm of social perspective, without the slightest doubt, studying history attribute to history analysis, in that it would come down to more information, archaeological site, and investigation. A salient example of such attribution is old books, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take boring task for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint unawareness of past experiences problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to museum, historical events, and even ancient Egypt. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of history field in academic study.

To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of studying the past history are more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the education standpoint, historica...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lization but also cultural values. Within the realm of social perspective, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 450, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... opportunity to pinpoint unawareness of past experiences problems. Likewise, hardly had they con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f history field in academic study. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72413793103 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18379517622 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665517241379 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.297645851 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149405079952 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456406775636 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040034813396 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877751284322 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351829984906 0.0609392437508 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.