The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do you think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
Recently, the environmental problems has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "who is responsible for solving the environmental problems?". Whereas it is a widely held view that government is responsible to solve environmental problems, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the climatology standpoint, the global climate change is bound up inextricably with global warming effects, which indicates it leads to both coastal errosion and radioactive radiations. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between temprature rising and carbon dioxide emission as well as an exponential increase in air pollution. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of industrial pollution is correlated positively with not only clean energy revolution but also solar energy.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, solving environmental issues attribute to collaboration between different parts, in that it would come down to government, organization, and individuals. A salient example of such attribution is indestrial pollution, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take renewable energy sources for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint climate change problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to recycling process, deforestration the tropics, and even cutting trees. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of green energy.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that government, organization, and individuals are accountable to solve environmental problems. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98976109215 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36109727932 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675767918089 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5335915321 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114358624555 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339900253642 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454313957043 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723953231785 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565639602609 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.76 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.