In recent days, there is an ongoing dispute on Einstein's quote where he stated that the only thing that interfered with his learning is his education, and it inevitably ignited a controversy. Even though multitudinous people hold a view that education constrains learning, I vehemently dissent the view, and I strongly concur that education helps in learning, and education is a crucial part of learning.
Firstly, learning is inextricably entwined with education, which implies that it promotes both that learning is a part of education and the fact that education provides the fundamentals for the learning. Furthermore, in 2009, a group of eminent researchers conducted a longitudinal study and ascertained empirical evidence suggesting a correlation between learning and education, and an exponential increase in academic success. Consequently, it resonates the contention that education is correlated positively with not only in learning but also in academic success. Therefore, education performs a pivotal role in academic success and is a crucial part of learning.
Additionally, within the field of Physics, without the slightest ambiguity, Einstein was associated with complex subjects that needed complex education. Furthermore, a salient precedent of such relation is the lack of motivation, which is a cause for solicitude since it promotes the notion that education hinders learning. Consequently, it is plausible to insinuate the pivotal role of education.
In conclusion, after analyzing the embellished points including the fact that Einstein worked on complex subjects that required an advanced level of learning, which was not part of conventional education, and the facts that education, in fact, helps in learning, and provides fundamentals necessary for further learning, I firmly believe that education does not interfere with learning, and furthermore, education is a fundamental part of learning.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 6.10837438424 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 5.94088669951 303% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 5.75862068966 382% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73076923077 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24140206833 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486013986014 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.931034482759 752% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.4622491019 50.4703680194 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.9 104.977214359 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 20.9669160288 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0139674535674 0.242375264174 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00637797344004 0.0925447433944 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0103291974027 0.071462118173 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.010156872537 0.151781067708 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00630228709529 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.55 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.