Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Do u agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience
Recently, learning a new language at childhood has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are Pros and Cons of it in future?". Whereas it is a widely held view that learning a new language at an early age is not highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, primitive education is bound up inextricably with schools, which indicates it leads to both modern teaching methods and new assessment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between language learning and early life as well as an exponential increase in performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of academic performance is correlated positively with not only mental ability but also natural talent.
Within the realm of psychological, without the slightest doubt, children's mind attribute to practical skills, in that it would come down to foreign language, local accent, and practice. A salient example of such attribution is English learning, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take formal language for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint severe education problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to computer program, showing slides, and even entertainment activity. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of modern techniques for language learning and using graphical cards for education.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of learning language in childhood outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7119205298 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17532231634 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665562913907 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.530475998 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.692307692 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265666930018 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756252387746 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588375535137 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136693461368 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570891835517 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.