“More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of being available more inforamation online and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that library books are highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using public library can be a plus, and I will analyze throughout this eaay.
From book publishers standpoint, using scientific books can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the facts that universities libraries, as well as schools libraries, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research that discovered the importance of academic books. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both academic and scientific books apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of information technology, online data might increase the consequences of decreasing studying of books. Moreover, fundamental aspects of online ebooks, relate to this reality that the demerits of online tutorials pertain to IT. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using online websites is correlated negatively with online malwares. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of online books.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of books on the libraries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of online textbooks prove the significance of online books, but also pinpoint IT implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'academic research'.
Suggestion: academic research
...I was a university student, I performed an academic research that discovered the importance of acade...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66403162055 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1895396453 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628458498024 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5642073584 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174633736398 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605864572461 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243502109299 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100238752167 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247397333321 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.