Any recent Invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society.
Recently the phenomenon of recently invention and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of systematic society is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that improving benefit can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, proving beneficial can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in tha fact merits of detriment management, as well as benefit management, are inextricable bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discoverd globalization society. Thus, beneficial ramifications on both social media and social need apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, proving detrimental might increase the consequences of invent management. Moreover, fundamental aspects of human invent, relate to this reality that the demerits of modern society pertain to local society. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of society issues is correlated negatively with thinking skills. Hence, its correct to presume the preconceived notion of new inventions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of intellectual society far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advanteges of professional invention prove the significence of smart society, but also pinpoint political society implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75918367347 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23611955963 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661224489796 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2127547865 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225048748362 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719109785327 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686282311909 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118511056025 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321234666126 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.