More information available online, so library books are useless. Do you agree or disagree with statement?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that more information available online, so library books are useless. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
To embark with, there are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that more information available online, so library books are useless cannot only contribute to online data, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of more information available online, so library books are useless.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can concluded that the benefits of more information available online, so library books are useless are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0888030888 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85189960302 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5725154403 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324579376334 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136615685554 0.0925447433944 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157092761362 0.071462118173 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227351178391 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537304186293 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.