Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently the phenomenon of a more effective way and it is correct to presume the notion of practical experience. Although contested by many that the matter of positive effect is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that teaching tools can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, life experience can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of experience management, as well as experimental facts, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered effective regulations. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both comparing parameter and comparing way apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, scientific bookshop might increase the consequences of university bookstore. Moreover, fundamental aspects of comic books could relate to this reality that the demerits of teaching studies pertain to the teacher. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that experimental development is correlated negatively with having the scientific experience. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being effective.
To conclude while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of historical teaching far outweigh it is drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the role of experience prove the significance of effective improvement, but also pinpoint the experimental impact implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67843137255 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32579077443 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2568206197 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263188620116 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776162647309 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621982544499 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132588972143 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656982079335 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.