Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?
Recently, the phenomenon of being recycling wastes a big issue and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the government activities for waste recycling are highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that making useful laws can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From people stanpoint, the influx of wastes can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the facts that diseases relate to wastes, as well as government taxes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research that discovered the government role for recyling wastes. Thus beneficial ramifications of both legal requirements and some laws apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of lawyers, recycling wastes might increase the consequences of health problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of health relate to this reality that the demerits of laws pertain to government. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of recyling is correlated negatively to laws. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of government.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of recycling far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of laws prove its significance, but also pinpoint recycle implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'academic research'.
Suggestion: academic research
...I was a university student, I performed an academic research that discovered the government role for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...he government role for recyling wastes. Thus beneficial ramifications of both legal ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56967213115 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17708079549 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647540983607 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4512060829 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254999936182 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806687831641 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639067601213 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136224469468 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656376464908 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.