Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views.
Recently, the phenomenon of working long hours and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that achieving success is highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that giving importance to free time can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From social workers standpoint, hard working can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that successful results, as well as creating free times, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of skilled workers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of working long hours in companies and accessing to success apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of hard workers, hard-working might increase the consequences of health issues after a long time. Moreover, fundamental aspects of achieving success relate to this reality that the demerits of a long time working pertain to decreasing free time. As a tangible example, a scientific research was undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of working at the hard statuses is correlated negatively with the work performed. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of workers.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of log time working far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of social workers prove its significance, but also pinpoint achieving success implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...t throughout this essay. From social workers standpoint, hard working can provide th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52290076336 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13156948884 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618320610687 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9863692053 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.583333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263621671819 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854679002103 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524572378269 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143009534924 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441488099868 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.