In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and it is the corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of credit card is highly beneficial, such as issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the role of people can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the economical society can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the modern society, as well as cashless management, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment that discovered skilled people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cashless payment and cash payment apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, using credit cards might increase the consequences of social requirements. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of bank cards could relate to this reality that the demerits of international people pertain to debit cards. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of social studies is correlated negatively with people's life. Hence, it's correct to presume the preconceived notion of hard-working people.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of the cashless process far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of credit account, but also pinpoint social policy implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.464 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11139582824 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5882004873 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208365359811 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574986457247 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419912248746 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106463865254 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311221157009 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.