An increasing number of people choose to study and work in big cities. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, phenomenon of increasing peoples in big cities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the advantages and disadvantages of it?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it has not bad consequences, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, main cities are bound up inextricably with more opportunities, which indicates they lead to both academic study and job offering. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between full-employment and annual salary as well as an exponential increase in more facilities. Their academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of professional careers is correlated positively with not only academic certification but also large company.
Within the realm of social perspective, without the slightest doubt, urban areas attribute to career life, in that it would come down to skilled workers, young employees, and talented people. A salient example of such attribution is job satisfactory, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take high unemployment for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint economy down turn problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to transportation, family expenditure, and even household income. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of precise planning and governmental aids for upgrading rural areas.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the disadvantages of increasing people in big cities for study and work far outweigh its advantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...heir academic criticism was impressive. consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tification but also large company. Within the realm of social perspective, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al aids for upgrading rural areas. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74418604651 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28944928448 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677740863787 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3207654781 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190907211884 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501998944093 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898410768769 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121128359413 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100140188936 0.0609392437508 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.