Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished, while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives. What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison, punishment or r

Essay topics:

Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished, while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives. What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison, punishment or rehabilitation?

Recently the phenomenon of punishing criminals and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of teaching criminals are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that spending time in prisons can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, the primary function can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of teaching culprits, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient punishments. Hence, beneficial ramifications of better lives are remarkable.

From a scientific point of view, keeping in prisons can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of vicious criminals are visible. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient functions. Thus, predicted outcomes of intolerable prisons are noticeable.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of punishing criminals far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of teaching culprits prove the significance of rehabilitation, but also pinpoint possible implications.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80555555556 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28221803769 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7006572696 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159890655656 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491338542819 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272483251997 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806937936921 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209597854601 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.