Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities. What are the reasons? Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages.
Recently, the phenomenon of leaving homes and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of rural areas are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded both positive and constructive thoroughly by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that young persons can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying and working in the cities can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of experienced people, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of leaving the home. Thus, beneficial ramifications of rural areas are visible.
From a scientific point of view, working in the cities can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of urban areas are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described frustrated people. Hence, predicted outcomes of congested cities are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying and working in the cities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do advantages of leaving homes prove the significance of a young person, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49553571429 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0920069559 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0090226134 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.909090909 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264999552214 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833039684158 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521575960916 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147216792711 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617018175291 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.