The world’s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants of our planet and give the solution?
Recently, the phenomenon of the world's governments and organizations and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of pressing problems are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that the world's inhabitants can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, facing a lot of issues can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of efficient governments and organizations, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of brilliant solutions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of an inhabitable planet are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, facing a lot of problems can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that the demerits of inefficient governments are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described unworkable solutions. Hence predicted outcomes of
atrocious issues are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the world's governments and organizations far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of pressing problems prove the significance of an acceptable solution, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...versity described unworkable solutions. Hence predicted outcomes of atrocious issu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e solutions. Hence predicted outcomes of atrocious issues are noticeable. To co...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Atrocious
...lutions. Hence predicted outcomes of atrocious issues are noticeable. To conclude, w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76623376623 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38518727518 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0956226693 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.090909091 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222119937476 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700999080607 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483010865253 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985926042496 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509803453492 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.