If Voting is compulsory in democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy?
Recently, the phenomenon of democratic societies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of the compulsory voting are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that the nature of democracy can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, being democratic can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of democratic countries, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of the compulsory voting. Thus, beneficial ramifications of profitable conclusions are crucial.
From a scientific point of view, a democratic society can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of the inefficient voting are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described the natural democracy. Hence, predicted outcomes of detrimental conclusions are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a democratic society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the compulsory voting prove the significance of a brilliant conclusion, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76233183857 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33130438898 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627802690583 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.644231856 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.818181818 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236332134559 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074075365082 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310090262829 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129719143501 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259889438779 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.