Marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short term strategies?
Recently, the phenomenon of marketing and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of sophisticated companies are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that short-term strategies can be a plus, and I will investigate it throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, profitable marketing can supply society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of vast companies, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of reputation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of basic strategies are visible.
From a scientific point of view, managing markets can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of long-term strategies are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient companies. Hence, the predicted outcomes of a detrimental strategy are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of basic short-term strategies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of professional companies prove the significance of a profitable market, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 214.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88317757009 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38399071139 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672897196262 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5520771814 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252203425929 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796012431224 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620021231525 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140270415386 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555632201861 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.