Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change?
Recently, the phenomenon of replacing large shopping malls and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of basic changes are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that replaced small shops can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, replaced large shopping malls can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of traditional small shops, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of brilliant changes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of cost-effective shops are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, replacing small shops can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of awful changes are visible. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described costly shopping malls. Hence, predicted outcomes of inefficient shops are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of replacing small shops far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of large shopping malls prove the significance of an excellent change, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69196428571 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14020535449 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.056255012 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.909090909 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272586770714 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918357675095 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611107129234 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156301749582 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337667623825 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.