What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions.

Essay topics:

What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions.

Recently the phenomenon of hosting sports events and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of a tremendous bid are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that sports games can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, hosting an event can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of a lucrative bid, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of a brilliant blessing. Hence, beneficial ramifications of efficient hosting are remarkable.

From a scientific point of view, hosting a sporting episode can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of costly events are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient bids. Thus, predicted outcomes of an atrocious cruse are noticeable.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of hosting sports events far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of an excellent bid prove the significance of a profitable event, but also pinpoint possible implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51339285714 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18046442428 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651785714286 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2345364492 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.272727273 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18825775198 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659218295699 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519375148738 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113918757696 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385706097818 0.0609392437508 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.