Some people think the purpose of education is to prepare the future workforce and make good members of society. Others think the purpose of education should lead to self-fulfillment. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of education's purposes and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of preparing future workforces are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that making good members of society can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the purposes of education can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of sophisticated workforces, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of brilliant members. Thus, beneficial ramifications of self-fulfillment people are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, education's targets can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient workforces are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described preparing members of societies. Hence, predicted outcomes of making self-fulfillment people are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of education's purposes in the future far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of excellent workforces and members prove the significance of a self-fulfillment person, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88596491228 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44482015991 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7134445023 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26059882307 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843787885198 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346961045966 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144623094559 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254258274334 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.