It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit, but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of preserving the culture and environment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of visiting a place are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that a responsible tourist can be a plus, and I will investigate this throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, preserving a culture can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of environmental aspects, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of responsible tourists. Thus, beneficial ramifications of preserving the environment are visible.
From a scientific point of view, a preserved environment can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of a preserved culture are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described visiting places. Hence, predicted outcomes of the impossible preserving are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of preserving the culture and environment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of important tourists prove the significance of a responsible tourist, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77092511013 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37430556048 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612334801762 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7161848784 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.090909091 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278728140124 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928892569065 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290482162128 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156211159038 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327286464387 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.