Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples.
Recently the phenomenon of children's acts and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of responsible parents are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that being legally responsible can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, responsible parents can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of legal acts, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient parents. Thus, beneficial ramifications of sophisticated children are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, irresponsible parents can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient relationships are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described awful children's acts. Hence, predicted outcomes of detrimental activities are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of responsible parents far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of children's acts prove the significance of legal activities, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86976744186 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34290818811 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66976744186 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.768738608 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.727272727 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203349246502 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638975585486 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453220963375 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112783826601 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238707461699 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.