Some universities deduct students’ work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions?
Recently the phenomenon of deducting students' works and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of overdue assignments are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that alternative actions can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, brilliant students' works can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of hard-working students, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of an excellent assignment. Hence, beneficial ramifications of appropriate actions are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, deducted students' works can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient assignments are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described atrocious actions. Thus, predicted outcomes of lazy students are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting students' works far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sophisticated assignments prove the significance of an acceptable action, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88584474886 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31367821206 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662100456621 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3326543233 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.181818182 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225833367611 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727933135316 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370667370542 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125092729583 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364421996445 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.21 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.