What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions.

Essay topics:

What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions.

Recently, the phenomenon of bidding to host sports events and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that it is a blessing to bid host sports events can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, bidding host sports events is a blessing can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, hosting sports events is a curse might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the creative process is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is true to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of bidding to host sports events are a curse far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49402390438 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15495590554 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629482071713 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0579141936 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240408427262 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877327468942 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907992678022 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144688224904 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473674321197 0.0609392437508 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.