What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions.
Recently, the phanomenon of offering specific price to host sports events and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue is paramount as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, loads of dwellers do not consider it. I am inclined to believe that it can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of determining a particular price for holding the sports events can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of boosting economy. From my own experience, when I was a university pupil, I performed an academic wxperiment which discovered these details. Firstly, hosting sports events has a direct influence on enhancing and developing the economy. A considerable amount of money will be earned from visitors and advertisments. Hence, it is necessary to determine a specific price for the responsibility of hosting. This decision leads to fierce competition and enhance the quality. Furthermore, hosting the sports events that are quite popular among populations provides loads of opportunities including providing an amazing entertainment for inhabitants. Due to these benefits every nation would like to accept the hosting of these events. Therefore, the best host can be elected by the process of bidding.
In addition, the idea of bidding for choozing a host for sports events has other advantage including providing desirable conditions for competition to be selected for hosting. The bidding omit the unqualified members.
In conclusion, while there are several other merits for bidding to host the sports events, I profoundly believe that the following reasons are the most significant ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'omits'.
Suggestion: omits
...to be selected for hosting. The bidding omit the unqualified members. In conclus...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07381362199 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7315739089 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173617745851 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590664875084 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526597765113 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112297691469 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149124797203 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.