With the right amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of the belief that people can learn anything without teaching by an expert, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that a right amount of motivation can be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly devastating and negative by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mere the practice cannot be enough, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to disagree with learning without participant in a classroom. At first, many talent people have ability to learn arts by self-educating. However, many careers need academic lessons and teaching by an expert. For example, the professions such as programming and building mapper need to practice and learn in a class by a teacher.
In addition, the Internet is a good source for intelligent people who can learn arts very soon. But, learning everything theoretically is not enough for finding a job related to the career, which an individual gained that no have any experience with it. For instance, a recent research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2014 has shown that companies employ people who have experienced in a practical space.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of self-studying far outweighed its benefits.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of the belief t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ice and learn in a class by a teacher. In addition, the Internet is a good sour...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have experienced in a practical space. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30666666667 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08786873642 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631111111111 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3153509145 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.545454545 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263574355483 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911274101607 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761379250656 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131553684218 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879652502609 0.0609392437508 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.