Tobacco and related products have been gotten one of the most controversial issues nowadays. It is an obvious truth that using cigarettes have reduced in comparison with last decade but using other products of tobacco have enhanced drastically, so some people think it should be kind of illegal habit and others have not such a kind opinion. In this essay I will evaluate the idea of both sides.
Firstly, the detrimental effects of these activities were revealed for societies during recent century for instance vast majority of respiratory disease is just one of the consequences. In addition, it has destructive thematic impact on every countries culture. So individuals who have tendency to get it illegal could have reasonable reasons for their idea.
On the other hand, some people believe that there should not to be limitation for smoking specially tobacco products and it could not be compulsory and forbidden activity. If you consider psychological aspect of this phenomenon it will assume as intrapersonal matter. The governmental people just can forbid it in public place and in the official battalion. So it is right to individuals to use It freely but not in the forbidden area.
In a nutshell, with above mentioned I believe , although using tobacco or cigarette as well as smoking pipes have destructive impression in every bodies life but it is not adequate reason to make it illegal moreover using it in every place for example in covered places is not acceptable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...ally, so some people think it should be kind of illegal habit and others have not su...
^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nutshell, with above mentioned I believe , although using tobacco or cigarette as ...
^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bodies'' or 'body's'?
Suggestion: bodies'; body's
...es have destructive impression in every bodies life but it is not adequate reason to m...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le in covered places is not acceptable.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09426229508 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86541077779 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581967213115 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2995945619 50.4703680194 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.25397266985 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238753088638 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759901285654 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122004874214 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140303923512 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11158887036 0.0609392437508 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.