With the advancement in technology people are leaning more towards the digital gadgets this leads to a debatable topic if libraries should incorporate these techniques to serve better. I partially agree to the affirmation that library should completely diver the usages towards the digital tools.
In the context of the first notion, libraries are part of almost all the universities, colleges or schools since a long time. The values and the knowledge provided by the books in the libraries is tremendous and no other place or gadget in my opinion could beat that position. Libraries are the part of the society since 1830's almost since then the true aesthetic offered by libraries remains the same. Student can study in a peaceful and comfortable environment when sitting in a library. This cannot be attained when we are studying in home or in any other public places as the disturbance inferred will not allow individual to focus.
Secondly, although the importance of the gadgets in today's society cannot be ignored but, in my opinion when these sort of techniques will be incorporated along with the traditional book keeping practices in libraries this might worse the situation. As these gadgets are full of information students might encompass themselves in some vague activities which will not do any good. Hence, libraries can be worked in coalition with digital gadgets but with proper care and attention.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion will propounds to the view that both libraries and digital gadgets has their importance in their respective field but, blending them together is not a virtuous idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...nnot be ignored but, in my opinion when these sort of techniques will be incorporated alon...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...braries this might worse the situation. As these gadgets are full of information s...
^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'propound'
Suggestion: propound
...nclusion, the foregoing discussion will propounds to the view that both libraries and dig...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, sort of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20912547529 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77548309209 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570342205323 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3784290127 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.545454545 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229909871959 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086687010779 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586932605043 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139561929216 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542875829674 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.