Should schools provide organized activities for children after lessons end?
Recently, the phenomenon of schools activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of practical activities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that training courses can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, children lessons can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the natural talent, as well as mental abilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the children development. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both practical lessons and learning facilities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, school programs might increase the consequences of private schools. Moreover, fundamental aspects of children abilities could relate to this reality that demerits of the educational development pertain to brilliant students. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of compulsory education is correlated negatively with improving knowledge. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of dependent children.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of providing activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of knowledgeable children prove the significance of public schools, but also pinpoint entertainment lessons implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29418639424 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1870010259 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.916666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187918851449 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577178659043 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358773761607 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10050273425 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262035634387 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.