Should schools provide organized activities for children after lessons end?
Recently, the phenomenon of organized activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of scheduled classes is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that outdoor activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, providing after lessons activities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of modern libraries, as well as well-equipped schools, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of school programs. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both well-educated teachers and hard-working pupils apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, theoretical courses might increase the consequences of final exams. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of useless lessons would relate to this reality that the demerits of experimental knowledge pertain to old-fashioned teaching methods. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of innovative ideas is correlated negatively with wasting students' talent. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of decreasing cognitive skills.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of practical courses far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of improving practical skills prove the significance of useful learning, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...notion of decreasing cognitive skills. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8416988417 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29393642068 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687258687259 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4921965692 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.083333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12579691443 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341544786133 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524651990928 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593372126945 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527721303371 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.45 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.