Computer and online games should be banned to students in schools as they have no educational value. What's your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of computer games and their corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of online books is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that educational achievements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a high-value curriculum can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of modern devices, as well as laptops, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of practical courses. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both well-educated software developers and limited gaming methods apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, preventing students to play games might increase the consequences of inappropriate activities. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of uneducated tutors might relate to this reality that the demerits of hard-working students pertain to social improvement. As an example, some research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of online libraries is correlated negatively with traditional manuscripts. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of old-fashioned schools.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of online activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of well-equipped universities prove the significance of technological development, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8671875 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44813695167 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6796875 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9165699921 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.166666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12576896413 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411472660822 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338565539301 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668861931185 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299402753749 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.46 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.