Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure.
Recently, the phenomenon of the work-study balance and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of feeling under pressure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a hard-working person can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, lacking time for education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of well-educated employees, as well as career development, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a strong relationship between working and learning. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both part-time jobs and well-paid jobs apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, education and working overlap might increase the consequences of full-time jobs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of lacking job opportunities might relate to this reality that the demerits of online courses pertain to a difficult job. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of strict teachers is correlated negatively with university students. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational development.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being focused on studying far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of modern education methods prove the significance of online jobs, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66287878788 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2664585551 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674242424242 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8414916362 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.583333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221730247255 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632161416451 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380911983733 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109110430347 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401287299507 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.