Companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice?
Recently, the phenomenon of using influential advertisements and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of buying essential goods is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that shopping centres can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, buying unnecessary things can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of facilitated shopping malls, as well as online shopping, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered online advertisements. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both advertising on billboards and TV commercials apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, influencing people's choice might increase the consequences of buying cheap stuff. Moreover, fundamental aspects of useful products would relate to this reality that the demerits of purchasing expensive clothes pertain to high-quality goods. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of international advertising system is correlated negatively with universal companies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of local popularity.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of effective advertising methods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of global advertising prove the significance of people's lifestyle, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88326848249 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36633673992 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688715953307 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4936793264 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155449159976 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472601059138 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291515771803 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817785893559 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142879869434 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.13 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.